Further readings with respect to the (University of Colorado) Condon Report:

history channel documentary What you'll discover in the non-Condon composed greater part of the University of Colorado report is that case after case (well around 30% of cases actually) are unexplainable. How Condon can say that there's nothing to the subject in the outline, while his group recommends that 30% of what you've researched is definitely not 'nothing', remains a confounding recorded secret - with the exception of that prior spilled notice which demonstrated that Condon, notwithstanding being a researcher, had a shut personality on the subject. Along these lines, read the whole report - do as such, and after that discussion to me! In opposition to prominent assessment, the Condon report demonstrated the requirement for elevated examination, not the need to forsake the examination.

Fuller, John G. (Proofreader); Aliens in the Skies: The New UFO Battle of the Scientists: The Scientific Rebuttal to the Condon Committee Report: Testimony by Six Leading Scientists Before the House Committee on Science and Astronautics July 29, 1968; G.P. Putnam's Sons, N.Y.; 1969:
Harkins, R. Roger and Saunders, David R; UFOs? Yes! Where the Condon Committee Went Wrong; Signet Books, N.Y.; 1968: [Saunders was an individual from the University of Colorado UFO Study.